I've been curious for a long time about the prevalence and diversity of religion at all times and places throughout human history. We even have some archeological evidence about what look like religious artifacts in pre-historical times. With all this time and effort given to this sacred task, you could wonder if we'll ever get it right – that is to say, is it possible to find a body of religious understanding, symbol, and ritual that could be proven to be the “correct” understanding – the one that any rational person would have to accept?
In my experience, the search for the “correct” religious understanding constitutes a very dangerous approach indeed. It inevitably results in divisiveness, increased fear, suspicion, and efforts to convert those who believe differently, sometimes by threatening and even deadly means. Furthermore, so much of religious language, practice, and articulated theology has been shown to include political, economic, and even overtly racist motivation.
In Community of Promise, a different kind of religious understanding brings people together. This novel, like many others, can be seen as an experiment in “what if.”
So, what if religion began with the understanding that there is no correct way to believe? What if worship of God had nothing to do with creating an advantage for yourself over your foes? What if God does not set people against each other, but is manifest in the relational spaces between people? What if the individuals within a community truly relied upon one another's developing relationship with the Divine, and what if the community turned out to be capable of a deeper appreciation of truth than the individual? What if we could extend that process to say that even groups with differing perspectives could learn and grow through mutual sharing?
And finally, what if we didn't have to set up “official” religious bodies to shape and control the beliefs and behavior of the masses?
These are big questions, but don't let the number of them be confusing. They all really boil down to one: What if the Promised Land, or the Realm of God, or the healthiest possible practice of community is truly “within and among us?”
Wayne Gustafson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Hi, loved your post. It raises some really pertinent questions. We are also trying to understand religion in our own different way. Take a look at our blog http://www.thewritinglabspiritualism.blogspot.com and let us know what you think about it.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of a novel with "what ifs" about religion. I'm glad someone has the courage to write it. One reason that people don't like venturing into that territory is that is so controversial.
ReplyDeleteI don't even get a lot of your "what ifs." What if we didn't have to set up "official" religious bodies to shape and control the beliefs and behavior of the masses? Well, we DON'T. No official religious body set up or sanctioned Westboro Baptist Church.
And I don't get this business of worrying about people trying to convert you to their religion. Yes, some have attempted to convert by the sword. And some people have been coerced into joining unions. Coercion should always be condemned, whether it is religious, political, economic, or sexual.
Best of luck with this.
Thanks Douglass,
ReplyDeleteI think is a particularly political use of religion to try to control beliefs or behavior with it. I contend that at its best, religion can be supportive of growth, learning, development, and relationship. These help create a safer society without coercion.
WEG